Worker killed in wood drying kiln, manufacturer fined $281,250

Individual working inside kiln was unable to get out due to malfunctioning push bar

Worker killed in wood drying kiln, manufacturer fined $281,250

Satin Finish Hardwood Flooring (now known as Prodtor), a manufacturer of pre-finished hardwood flooring, has been fined a total of $281,250 for the death of a worker. The company was fined $225,000, plus a victim fine surcharge of $56,250.

On Dec. 13, 2017, a worker employed by Satin Finish Hardwood Flooring suffered fatal thermal injuries after becoming trapped in an operating wood-drying kiln at the workplace.

The company's factory in Toronto included three large wood-drying kilns made of sheet metal and capable of holding large quantities of wood while it is dried with high heat from a gas-fired appliance.

The kilns are equipped with large hanger-style doors that open to load and unload wood. There are two man doors on each kiln, one at the front and one at the rear of each kiln, through which workers enter or exit. The inside of the kilns has no source of either natural or artificial lighting.

On that day, two workers were asked to fix a malfunctioning damper on kiln #3. The workers determined that the damper was frozen open, and that the best course of action would be to let the heat from the kiln melt the ice on the damper.

Later that day, the two workers met at kiln #3 to check the status of the damper. One of the workers turned off the kiln; it would remain hot for some time after that.  After attending the control room, the workers opened the rear man door that leads to the heated wood-drying area in the kiln to assess if they could see sunlight through the dampers on the roof and thus determine the functioning of the frozen damper. The workers were unable to see any sunlight due to the steam in the kiln and the overcast day.

One of the workers ascended to the roof of the kiln to free up the previously frozen damper, and the other went into the kiln's control room.

The co-worker descended to the ground level and could not locate the other worker.

The co-worker and a supervisor proceeded to kiln #3 and opened the front man door. They found the worker lying on the floor unresponsive with vital signs absent. At the time, the kiln was operating at a temperature of 65 C, with very high humidity.

Emergency services were called and attended but were unable to save the worker.

The Ministry of Labour investigated with the assistance of a ministry engineer who examined the front man door where the worker had been found.

There was a door lock assembly designed to be used to open the door either from inside or outside the kiln. In the closed-door position, the lock assembly had a latch which locked the door closed. The lock assembly was functional from outside the kiln, allowing workers to enter the kiln. However, on the inside there was a push bar (also known as an "anti-panic system") used to release the door latch from inside the kiln.

The door could not be opened from the inside. Corrosion was observed under the push bar and cracks seen in the body of the man door on the kiln-facing side.

After disassembling the door lock, the engineer noted that an internal component known as a "push pin" was corroded and seized, which prevented the door from being opened with the push bar from inside the kiln once the door was latched in the closed position. The engineer concluded that this was the direct cause of the fatal event, as the worker was unable to open the latched man door and leave the operating kiln.

The manufacturer's instructions for the door lock assembly outlines routine maintenance on the door lock assembly, including checking for corrosion of metal parts. The defendant did not have a preventative maintenance schedule at the workplace for the door assembly, and the door lock assembly was not maintained as recommended by the manufacturer.

In addition, the weatherstripping and metal around the push bar had deteriorated and corroded, creating openings that allowed moist air to enter and corrode the door lock assembly. Both the corrosion and malfunctioning of the push bar could be detected during the normal use of the door.

The ministry's engineering consultant concluded that maintenance would have prevented malfunctioning of the door lock assembly.

The defendant failed as an employer to ensure that a man door to kiln #3 could be opened by a worker from inside the kiln once the door latched closed, and failed to ensure that the man door to kiln #3 and its "anti-panic system" or door lock assembly were maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.These were an offence under section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, which states that the employer "shall take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker."

Source: Ontario Ministry of Labour